Sociology of expertise as public sociology
Gil Eyal
Chapter 21 in Research Handbook on Public Sociology, 2023, pp 294-309 from Edward Elgar Publishing
Abstract:
This paper compares and contrasts three versions of public sociology of expertise to evaluate how they respond to the current crisis of mistrust in experts: 1) Collins and Evans’ proposal for “Studies of Expertise and Experience” in which public sociologists of expertise essentially police the boundaries of public debate; 2) my own “networks of expertise” approach, which was influenced by research on “lay expertise,” and in which the public sociological task is to open up public discourse to those whose contributions were rendered invisible by existing mechanisms of attribution; 3) an emergent approach wherein the public sociologist focuses on the triangulation of relations of trust and mistrust at the access points of expert systems, and seeks to intervene in these relations to increase the possibilities for dialogue. All three approaches suffer from certain limitations and should be considered as complementary rather than alternatives.
Keywords: Politics and Public Policy Sociology and Social Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800377387/9781800377387.00030.xml (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:20272_21
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().