 Beyond the urban hierarchy: rethinking power and dominance in a dynamic settlement system. Chapter 2 in Rethinking Rural Studies, 2024, pp 24-31 from Edward Elgar Publishing Abstract: This chapter offers a critical examination of scholarly perspectives on the spatial organization of settlement systems. We rethink the conventional top-down, hierarchial approach of urban dominance, arguing that the spatial distribution of power among places is a dynamic process that provides a space for the agency of rural and smaller urban places. We reject the notion of an urban-rural binary and recommend that scholars and policymakers employ a lens of independence rather than dependence. This chapter also argues that while settlement systems are comprised of social, economic and political relationships and interdependencies, individual places still matter. People still engage with the challenges of daily life in places, and one’s place of residence still comprises a critical dimension of personal identity. We observe that the agency of individual places is contingent on a combination of their institutional capacity and their relationships with other places in the settlement system. Keywords: Development Studies; Economics and Finance; Environment; Geography; Politics and Public Policy Sociology and Social Policy; Sustainable Development Goals; Urban and Regional Studies (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:20496_2 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.