Multidimensional poverty measurement and preferences

François Maniquet

Chapter 37 in Research Handbook on Measuring Poverty and Deprivation, 2023, pp 401-409 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: Poverty measurement based on income or consumption fails to be consistent with welfare: a higher utility (that is, preference satisfaction) of an individual may go together with an increase in the contribution of this individual to poverty. The equivalence approach, which consists of computing the money needed to maintain a given level of utility, is the way to adjust income poverty measurement so that it becomes consistent with welfare. We review four equivalence approaches, and we compare the properties that each approach satisfies or fails to satisfy. Poverty measurement based on deprivation measures, on the other hand, cannot be adjusted to become consistent with welfare. We discuss how weights and deprivation thresholds can be designed to decrease the discrepancy between poverty and welfare in deprivation measures.

Keywords: Development Studies; Economics and Finance; Geography; Research Methods; Sociology and Social Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800883451/9781800883451.00051.xml (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:20574_37

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com
sales@e-elgar.co.uk

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla (darrel@e-elgar.co.uk).