Systematic literature reviews: opportunities and limits in ministerial adviser research
Arthur Meert,
Heath Pickering,
Marleen Brans and
Athanassios Gouglas
Chapter 12 in Handbook on Ministerial and Political Advisers, 2023, pp 173-195 from Edward Elgar Publishing
Abstract:
This chapter presents the results of two systematic literature reviews examining ministerial advisers in both the Westminster and Napoleonic administrative traditions. Methodologically, we argue the systematic scoping review is the most appropriate type to map this literature, given the diversity of data collection methods used, and the relative immaturity of the field in comparative conceptualisation. The empirical part of the chapter is split into two sections. The first maps fifty years of literature between 1970-2019 and uses four study characteristics - (1) publication timeline of studied political systems; (2) publication type; (3) research type; and (4) research themes - to challenge the perception of a ‘Westminster bias’ in the literature. The second empirical section sheds light on specific processes observed in both the Westminster (cabinetisation) and the Napoleonic (decabinetisation) worlds.
Keywords: Law - Academic; Politics and Public Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800886582/9781800886582.00021.xml (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:20725_12
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().