A right to refuse to kill? Human rights and conscientious objection to ‘assisted dying’ in the UK

Mary Neal

Chapter 5 in Research Handbook on Human Rights Law and Health, 2025, pp 107-135 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: Conscientious objection (CO) in healthcare, already much discussed in academic literature, is to the fore again in light of proposals to legalise ‘assisted dying’ in the United Kingdom. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has rarely considered the issue, but what jurisprudence there is clearly indicates that there is no right to CO for health professionals under Article 9 as currently understood. A right to military CO is now established under Article 9, however, and this chapter proposes (i) that this right can be understood as a ‘right to refuse to kill’, and (ii) that the ECtHR should extend it to health professionals in a very restricted range of contexts. It is argued here that theorising CO to assisted dying as a ‘right to refuse to kill’ could provide human rights protection where none currently exists and could also facilitate better understanding of issues like ‘indirect involvement’ and ‘effective referral’.

Keywords: Conscientious objection; Article 9 ECHR; Healthcare; Assisted dying; Military service (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
ISBN: 9781803928029
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781803928036.00013 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:21796_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().