Technology assessment and democratic theories: a critical review

Pierre Delvenne and Céline Parotte

Chapter 26 in Handbook of Technology Assessment, 2024, pp 259-268 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: This chapter aims to explore the roots of TA in relation to democracy. What kind of democracy are TA practitioners committed to, and how has this shaped the approaches they have developed? What is the potential of these visions for the ongoing understanding and revitalization of TA practices and democratic orders? We propose to review four theories of democracy that we find relevant and useful for understanding the role and work of TA today: the theories of discursive and deliberative democracy developed by Barber and Habermas, which are often considered to be the core of TA’s rationales and methodologies, and the agonistic theories of democracy developed by Marres and Mouffe, which have been most often neglected by scholarly work on TA. We identify what we call ‘disturbance zones’ at the intersection of these theories of democracy, and conclude by formulating bold proposals for thinking about the politics of technology assessment.

Keywords: Economics and Finance; Innovations and Technology; Sociology and Social Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781035310685.00038 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:22254_26

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().