The problem with peer review … they say as if there’s only one problem …

Keith Townsend, Adrian Wilkinson, Andrew Timming and Rebecca Loudoun

Chapter 31 in How to Keep Your Research Project on Track, 2024, pp 186-193 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: Central to the role of the academic researcher is the publication process. It can be rewarding to publish good quality research, but it’s fair to say that the process can sometimes present problems. This chapter examines a part of the publication process, the peer review. We outline some peculiar experiences that we have had with the peer review process and make some suggestions for researchers (and editors) to take forward.

Keywords: Business and Management; Education; Research Methods; General Academic Interest (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781035332724.00040 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:23326_31

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().