Modus vivendi, polycentricity, and “decolonizing” the study of the urban–rural divide
Kris Kanthak
Chapter 8 in Governing Differences, 2025, pp 172-185 from Edward Elgar Publishing
Abstract:
The global rise of anti-elite populism poses an existential threat to democracy worldwide. Many people outside of academia and urban centers feel excluded and maligned, potentially leading to a worldwide “revenge of places that don’t matter,” in which populist leaders can use this feeling of exclusion and disrespect to foment political strife and instability (Rodríguez-Pose 2018). But in this academic study of the deleterious consequences of the rise of “rural resentment,” there is a surprising lack of curiosity among academics about the nature of these resentments, as if somehow the insults against them emerge whole cloth from the imaginations of rural Americans. This chapter considers how the academic understanding of the urban–rural divide might change and improve if academics were willing to take the lessons learned from polycentricity and extend the perspectives in research discussions to include people who heretofore have been considered subjects, rather than producers, of research.
Keywords: Urban–rural divide; Community engaged research; Polycentricity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
ISBN: 9781035348572
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781035348589.00016 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:24033_9
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jack Sweeney ().