What’s Still Right With the Austrian School of Economics: A Comment on Boettke
Deirdre Nansen McCloskey
A chapter in Assessing Austrian Economics, 2019, vol. 24, pp 33-47 from Emerald Publishing Ltd
Abstract Being a relatively newer member to the school of Austrian economics, I have seen the world of the economics profession and its many schools of thought through many lenses. Having this different perspective, I disagree with Pete Boettke on his ideas for ways to change the procedural way the Austrian school does economics. We need to be empirical about not just the economy, but of the history of economic thought. I believe the main goal should not be higher impact factors, but true progression of scientific knowledge. More focus on what we are doing, and less on counting articles.
Keywords: Austrian economics; history of economic thought; economics profession (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/S1529-213420 ... RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:aaeczz:s1529-213420190000024004
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
Emerald Group Publishing, Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, BD16 1WA, UK
http://www.emeraldgr ... ies.htm?id=1529-2134
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Advances in Austrian Economics from Emerald Publishing Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Charlotte Maiorana ().