A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PURE AND PRETEST ESTIMATORS FOR A POSSIBLY MISSPECIFIED TWO-WAY ERROR COMPONENT MODEL

Badi Baltagi, Georges Bresson and Alain Pirotte

A chapter in Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models: Twenty Years Later, 2003, pp 1-27 from Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Abstract: In the spirit of White’s (1982) paper, this paper examines the consequences of model misspecification using a panel data regression model. Maximum likelihood, random and fixed effects estimators are compared using Monte Carlo experiments under normality of the disturbances but with a possibly misspecified variance-covariance matrix. We show that the correct GLS (ML) procedure is always the best according to MSE performance, but the researcher does not have perfect foresight on the true form of the variance covariance matrix. In this case, we show that a pretest estimator is a viable alternative given that its performance is a close second to correct GLS (ML) whether the true specification is a two-way, a one-way error component model or a pooled regression model. Incorrect GLS, ML or fixed effects estimators may lead to a big loss in MSE.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.101 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.101 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:aecozz:s0731-9053(03)17001-6

DOI: 10.1016/S0731-9053(03)17001-6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Advances in Econometrics from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().