Selection bias in evaluating treatment effects: Some formal illustrations

Arthur Goldberger

A chapter in Modelling and Evaluating Treatment Effects in Econometrics, 2008, pp 1-31 from Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Abstract: Regression analyses of compensatory educational programs have been criticized on the grounds that the pupils were not randomly selected. Specifically, it has been argued that a spurious deleterious effect of the treatment will be observed when the selection procedure systematically puts lower-ability students into the treatment group and higher-ability students into the control group. We evaluate this argument via a simple test score model: pretest score and posttest score are fallible measures of underlying true ability and the true treatment effect is zero. Posttest is regressed on pretest and a treatment dummy. The spurious effect arises when selection of subjects for treatment is explicit on the basis of true ability, but not when it is explicit on the basis of pretest score.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.101 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.101 ... 0731-9053(07)00001-1
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.101 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:aecozz:s0731-9053(07)00001-1

DOI: 10.1016/S0731-9053(07)00001-1

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Advances in Econometrics from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().