The great divide in microfinance: Political economy in microcosm

Bruce E. Moon

A chapter in Moving Beyond Storytelling: Emerging Research in Microfinance, 2009, pp 109-144 from Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Abstract: Woller, Dunford, and Woodworth (1999)andMorduch (2000)were among the first to discuss the existence of a “schism” in the study of microfinance. Although the exact dimensions of this divide are stated differently by various authors, the existence of alternative schools of thought is widely accepted (Brett, 2006;Bhatt & Tang, 2001;Mitlin, 2002;Robinson, 2001;Rhyne, 1998).

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... 3759(2009)0000092007
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:csefzz:s1569-3759(2009)0000092007

DOI: 10.1108/S1569-3759(2009)0000092007

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().