Complex Remanence vs. Simple Persistence: Are Hysteresis and Unit-Root Processes Observationally Equivalent?

Bruno Amable, Jerome Henry, Frederic Lordon and Richard Topol

A chapter in Economic Complexity, 2004, pp 67-89 from Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Abstract: Keywords:

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
Working Paper: Complex Remanence vs. Simple Persistence: Are Hysteresis and Unit-Root Processes observationally equivalent? (2005)
Working Paper: Complex Remanence vs. Simple Persistence: Are Hysteresis and Unit-Root Processes Observationally Equivalent ? (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:isetez:s1571-0386(2004)0000014006

DOI: 10.1108/S1571-0386(2004)0000014006

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().