WHAT EXPLAINS HADZA FOOD SHARING?

Frank W. Marlowe

A chapter in Socioeconomic Aspects of Human Behavioral Ecology, 2004, pp 69-88 from Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Abstract: Most hypotheses proposed to explain human food sharing address motives, yet most tests of these hypotheses have measured only the patterns of food transfer. To choose between these hypotheses we need to measure people’s propensity to share. To do that, I played two games (the Ultimatum and Dictator Games) with Hadza hunter-gatherers. Despite their ubiquitous food sharing, the Hadza are less willing to share in these games than people in complex societies are. They were also less willing to share in smaller camps than larger camps. I evaluate the various food-sharing hypotheses in light of these results.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.101 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (text/html)
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.101 ... d&utm_campaign=repec (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eme:reanzz:s0190-1281(04)23003-7

DOI: 10.1016/S0190-1281(04)23003-7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Research in Economic Anthropology from Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emerald Support ().