Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting?

Munshi Sulaiman

Chapter 8 in Boosting growth to end hunger by 2025: The role of social protection, 2018, pp 102-120 from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Abstract: Chapter 8 provides a comparative analysis of 48 graduation, livelihood, and cash transfer programs. Using income and consumption as the primary metrics of impact and focusing on long-term outcomes, the author assesses the sustainability of impact of these programs and compares both costs and impacts across the three types of approaches.

Keywords: income; costs; education; economic growth; programmes; consumption; cost benefit analysis; social policies; social welfare; livelihoods; rural development; cash transfers; poverty; project evaluation; Africa; Sub-Saharan Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147363

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fpr:ifpric:9780896295988_08

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in IFPRI book chapters from International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().