EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Paltamo Full Employment Experiment in Finland: A Neo-chartalist Job Guarantee Pilot Program?

Antti Alaja and Jouko Kajanoja
Additional contact information
Antti Alaja: Kalevi Sorsa Foundation
Jouko Kajanoja: Helsinki University

Chapter Chapter 7 in The Job Guarantee and Modern Money Theory, 2017, pp 149-169 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Long-term unemployment became a severe social problem in Finland after the early 1990s’ depression. Even though Finland experienced a period of robust export-led growth in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Finnish economy never returned to low unemployment rates of the 1980s, and in peripheral areas unemployment rates of 15–20 percent were not unusual. In the late 1990s, a new debate started to emerge in the Northeastern Kainuu regional council on how to respond to high economic and social costs of peripheral long-term unemployment. This debate initially led to a new kind of full employment experiment that took place in the small municipality of Paltamo in 2009–2013. In practice, the Paltamo municipality operated a public employment program that aimed at providing a suitable job for all unemployed jobseekers, improving the health, well-being and employability of the participants, and replacing various social and unemployment benefits with a single wage income. The experiment was made possible in the first place, because it had found political and financial support from the Finnish Ministry of Finance. It brought unprecedented visibility to the small municipality of Paltamo, and it started a national debate about alternatives in the Finnish employment and social policy. The experiment was a real success in terms of decreasing the rate of unemployment in Paltamo, and it had a positive impact on the well-being and employability of the participants. A popular view about the experiment in Finland, however, is that it is too expensive to be implemented at the national level. The proponents of the Paltamo model have pointed out that current estimates on the costs of the experiment have not taken into consideration the long-term effects on well-being, employability and social inclusion.

Keywords: Labor Market; Unemployment Benefit; Full Employment; Unemployed Person; Employment Program (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:bifchp:978-3-319-46442-8_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783319464428

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46442-8_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Binzagr Institute for Sustainable Prosperity from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:pal:bifchp:978-3-319-46442-8_7