Conclusion

Richard Pereira
Additional contact information
Richard Pereira: University of Birmingham

Chapter 5 in Financing Basic Income, 2017, pp 101-106 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract A review of the three basic income (BI) models and accompanying frameworks for creating a decent BI are presented in this chapter. A differentiation between positive and counterproductive BI proposals is made, particularly regarding the manner in which social services are treated in contrasting proposals. A wholesale approach to cutting public programmes is rejected as a financing model. Each chapter is then reviewed in this context, demonstrating how each achieves a progressive BI true to the definition of the concept.

Keywords: Basic income models; Universal dividend; Demogrant; NIT (negative income tax); Cost savings; Economic rent and taxation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:etbchp:978-3-319-54268-3_5

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783319542683

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54268-3_5

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().