Individuals and Agreements

David Reisman

Chapter 2 in James Buchanan, 2015, pp 12-32 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract The irreducible building-block is the discrete individual. There is no social welfare function and no metric of right and wrong that cannot be reduced to living human beings coming together in a mutual adjustment process to further their own objectives, self-perceived. Good rules are the rules that emerge from good procedures. That is why they are good. As for good outcomes, the normative posture is as kaleidoscopic as it is complaisant: ‘Whatever emerges from individual choices emerges… It is not a question of imposing a kind of global maximization process. I don’t think that that is proper or possible’ (BAM, 143). It is not proper or possible to tell Common Everyman what he thinks is ‘fair’, whether defence is a ‘public’ good or whether the market has ‘failed’. The gold standard is process. All that may legitimately be done is to design good procedures that allow humble Simple to speak his mind.

Keywords: Public Choice; Human Nature; Social Welfare Function; Methodological Individualism; Production Possibility Frontier (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:gtechp:978-1-137-42718-2_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137427182

DOI: 10.1057/9781137427182_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Great Thinkers in Economics from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().