Induction and Deduction

David Reisman ()
Additional contact information
David Reisman: Nanyang Technological University

Chapter Chapter 2 in Thomas Robert Malthus, 2018, pp 29-48 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Economics in the time of Malthus was torn between the abstract, symbolic and mathematical approach of Descartes and Ricardo and the facts-based empiricism of Bacon, Petty and Hume. Malthus said he wanted to rely principally on historical evidence but that theory was indispensable in order to interpret the record. His mixed methodology enabled him to back up his data with a priori conjectures and promising hypotheses. His investigations were always hampered by the lack of statistics and by the difficulty of testing hypotheses like those involving consensus, utility or popular unrest which are by their nature imprecise. The chapter shows that near-contemporaries like Wallace, Howlett, Price and Paley had encountered the same difficulties.

Keywords: Moral philosophy; Political economy club; Population Malthus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:gtechp:978-3-030-01956-3_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783030019563

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01956-3_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Great Thinkers in Economics from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().