People Like Nudges (Mostly)

Cass R. Sunstein ()
Additional contact information
Cass R. Sunstein: Harvard University

Chapter Chapter 2 in Human Agency and Behavioral Economics, 2017, pp 17-39 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract In recent years, there has been a great deal of debate about the ethical questions associatedNudge with “nudges,” understood as approaches that steer people in certain directions while fully maintaining freedom of choice. Evidence about people’s views cannot resolve the ethical questions, but in democratic societies (and probably nondemocratic ones as well), those views will inevitably affect what governments are willing to do. Existing evidence, including several nationally representative surveys, supports two general conclusions. First, there is a widespread support for nudges, at least of the kind that democratic societies have adopted or seriously considered in the recent past. Importantly, that support can be found across partisan lines. Second, nudges will not receive majority approval if they steer people in directions that are inconsistent with their interests or their values.

Keywords: Nudges; Manipulation; Active choosing; Default rules (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:paichp:978-3-319-55807-3_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783319558073

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55807-3_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Advances in Behavioral Economics from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().