Electoral Pressures and the Legal System: Friends or Foes?

Russell Sobel, Matt E. Ryan and Joshua Hall

Chapter Chapter 3 in The Pursuit of Justice, 2010, pp 37-50 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Decisions made within the legal system are typically viewed as being impartial informed only by the testimony and evidence presented and legal precedent. For this reason, many scholars treat legal decisions as exogenous events, that is, that they are independent of preexisting conditions (see, for example, Baicker and Gordon 2006). However, political scientists and legal analysts have long understood that in many cases factors outside what is presented in the courtroom affect the outcomes of legal cases.1 The race, gender, and political affiliation of individuals involved in the legal process have all been found to play a role in determining legal outcomes.2

Keywords: Racial Diversity; Supreme Court; District Attorney; Wrongful Conviction; Innocent Defendant (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-10949-0_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230109490

DOI: 10.1057/9780230109490_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().