Equity and Efficiency versus Freedom and Fairness: An Inherent Conflict
Yew-Kwang Ng (kwang.ng@monash.edu)
Chapter 3 in Increasing Returns and Economic Efficiency, 2009, pp 22-39 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract In the presence of very substantial increasing returns, freedom (such as in the choice of jobs or the place of residency) and fairness (horizontal equity) may be inconsistent with the attainment of (vertical) equity (interpersonal equalization of marginal welfare of income) and/or efficiency, even abstracting from familiar factors (incentive effects, administrative costs) accounting for the equity-efficiency trade-off. The imposition of congestion taxes on urban residency or the offer of high salaries to attract volunteer soldiers may achieve an efficient division of the population consistent with freedom and fairness but is unlikely to coincide with the equalization of the marginal welfare of income. This conflict may partly explain the urban–rural segregation in China and the prevalence of conscription in many countries. Needless to say, it does not justify most illiberal policies.
Keywords: Marginal Utility; Military Service; Urban Resident; Rural Resident; Social Welfare Function (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-23681-3_3
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230236813
DOI: 10.1057/9780230236813_3
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com) and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (indexing@springernature.com).