Action Learning and Action Research

Verna J. Willis

Chapter 11 in Action Learning and its Applications, 2010, pp 166-178 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract What can be gained by making a distinction between action learning and action research? The question is more than rhetorical. It can make a world of difference which approach you use, depending on your purpose. Further, if you should choose action learning, it can make a world of difference which particular “brand” you select, depending on how you view human beings and how comfortable you are with the assumption that they have capacities to self-direct their learning and their work. My contention is that action learning and action research are not identical, not even “blood brothers” — if for no other reason than that they spring from different origins and traditions. They do not share the same orientation towards the world. Having had “classic” experiences of both, I conclude that the difference between them is more significant than most people realize, and that misperceptions diminish the strengths of each.

Keywords: Action Learning; Classic Action; Participatory Action Research; General System Theory; Appreciative Inquiry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-25074-1_11

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230250741

DOI: 10.1057/9780230250741_11

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().