A Post Keynesian View of the Washington Consensus and How to Improve It

Paul Davidson

Chapter 7 in Interpreting Keynes for the 21st Century, 2007, pp 93-105 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract John Williamson coined the term “Washington Consensus” in 1989. This term, however, means different things to different people1 — and apparently even different things to Williamson at different times. Williamson (2002) states that this consensus requires ten reforms: 1. Fiscal Discipline. This was in the context of a region where almost all the countries had run large deficits that led to balance of payments crises and high inflation that hit mainly the poor because the rich could park their money abroad. 2. Reordering Public Expenditure Priorities. ... from things like indiscriminate subsidies to basic health and education. 3. Tax reform. Constructing a tax system that would combine a broad tax base with moderate marginal tax rates. 4. Liberalizing Interest Rates. In retrospect I wish I had formulated this in a broader way as financial liberalization, and stressed that views differed on how fast it should be achieved.2 5. A Competitive Exchange Rate. I fear I indulged in wishful thinking in asserting that there was a consensus in favor of ensuring that the exchange rate would be competitive, which implies an intermediate regime; in fact Washington was already beginning to subscribe to the two-corner doctrine. (Williamson has championed the establishment of FEER [a Fundamental Equilibrium Exchange Rate] target zone for the exchange rate, i.e., a zone based on a fixed competitive rate plus or minus ten percent. He has argued that FEER would simultaneously achieve internal and external balance.3)

Keywords: Exchange Rate; Full Employment; Free Lunch; Financial Liberalization; Washington Consensus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: A Post Keynesian view of the Washington consensus and how to improve it (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-28655-9_7

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230286559

DOI: 10.1057/9780230286559_7

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().