Chinese and Estonian Crisis Management Comparison

Ruth Alas and Junhong Gao
Additional contact information
Ruth Alas: Estonian Business School
Junhong Gao: Estonian Business School

Chapter 9 in Crisis Management in Chinese Organizations, 2012, pp 110-119 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract China and Estonia represent two different types of transition economies with rapid economic success and cultural change in the 1990s and the beginning of the new millennium. Together, both countries have experienced the socialist centrally-planned economy; however, the reasons were different. During the past few decades, both countries have gone through significant change processes in trying to transform their Soviet-type bureaucratic systems into more market-oriented (China) or fully market-oriented (Estonia) economic regimes. Today, Estonia is a democratic country, while China still retains its one-party communist regime (Alas et al., 2009a).

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Business Ethic; Leadership Style; Crisis Management; Chinese Manager (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-36316-8_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230363168

DOI: 10.1057/9780230363168_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().