The Rhetorical Patterns in Paradigmatic Policy Change

Joe Wallis and Brian Dollery ()
Additional contact information
Joe Wallis: Otago University

Chapter 8 in Market Failure, Government Failure, Leadership and Public Policy, 1999, pp 155-182 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract In his book The Rhetoric of Reaction, Albert Hirschman (1991) argues that each major advance in the development of citizenship in Western democracies — from civil to political to socio-economic citizenship — has provoked a strong reaction in which the opponents of reform have ‘unfailingly’ advanced a few common or typical arguments. Hirschman denotes these three lines of argument as ‘the perversity thesis’, the ‘futility thesis’, and the ‘jeopardy thesis’. Although he relates these theses to the question of the development of citizenship, he makes it clear that they can apply to any reform that constitutes a radical change (or paradigm shift) rather than an incremental adjustment to the previous policy configuration.

Keywords: Public Choice; Market Failure; Reform Process; Government Failure; Conspiracy Theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37296-2_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230372962

DOI: 10.1057/9780230372962_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().