On Measuring the Redistribution of Lifetime Income (1977)

Richard Layard

Chapter 3 in Tackling Inequality, 1999, pp 20-50 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract How far, if at all, does the State reduce inequality? Or, how far does a particular policy affect it? To answer these questions one has to compare the actual distribution of income after taxes and benefits (a vector V4) with some hypothetical alternative distribution (VH)} The measure of income normally used in such analyses is current annual income, regardless of the past or future income of those concerned (Nicholson, 1964; Musgrave, 1964). But this is unsatisfactory, partly because a person’s current income is a bad measure of his underlying real income, and especially because much government activity redistributes a person’s lifetime income over his lifetime more than it alters its total. The ‘annual-income approach’ thus gives the wrong impression in two ways: first, it exaggerates the basic inequality of incomes and then it exaggerates the amount of redistribution.

Keywords: Lorenz Curve; Social Welfare Function; Lifetime Income; Educational Expenditure; Consumption Stream (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37528-4_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230375284

DOI: 10.1057/9780230375284_3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().