Mass Privatisation and Endogenous Ownership Structure
Irena Grosfeld and
Iraj Hoshi
Chapter 6 in Secondary Privatisation in Transition Economies, 2003, pp 215-247 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract In several countries in Central and Eastern Europe special privatisation strategies have been used in order to transfer a large number of companies from the state to the private sector. These strategies are often qualified as mass privatisation (we shall also call them wholesale privatisation) because they applied to a large number of companies, the ownership of which was transformed according to some general formula.2 Based on the free transfer of assets to certain segments of the population, these methods were strongly criticised as being ‘artificial’, unable to provide firms with ‘real owners’ and to bring about improvement in their performance. One of the main criticisms concerned the dispersed ownership structure that wholesale privatisation was expected to generate. The implicit argument was that diffused ownership structure is inefficient because it is unable to guarantee good corporate governance and deep enterprise restructuring.
Keywords: Corporate Governance; Firm Performance; Ownership Structure; Minority Shareholder; Investment Fund (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37701-1_6
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230377011
DOI: 10.1057/9780230377011_6
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().