Multi-objective Decisions
Anatol Rapoport
Chapter 6 in Decision Theory and Decision Behaviour, 1998, pp 136-159 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract A sign of maturity is the recognition that one can’t have everything. Compromise and trade-off are almost always unavoidable in real life decision situations, not only when several parties with non-coincident interests are involved but also when one own’s objectives or desires compete with one another for attention or priorities. A person buying a car wants it to be safe, comfortable, economical and low priced. He can’t possibly satisfy all these objectives at once. A person looking for a job wants it to pay well, to offer opportunities for advancement, to be interesting, and so on. Generally, he will have to sacrifice some of these desiderata in order to satisfy others. Thus, the question invariably arises: ‘How much of this is worth how much of that?’ ‘How much more am I willing to pay for an apartment for being nearer to my place of work by how much?’ In considering candidates for a position, how is experience to be weighed against intelligence or against an attractive personality?
Keywords: Subjective Probability; Objective Probability; Certainty Equivalent; Common Unit; Interpersonal Comparison (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-37776-9_7
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230377769
DOI: 10.1057/9780230377769_7
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().