EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Fiscal and Distributive Justice

M. R. Griffiths and J. R. Lucas

Chapter Chapter 10 in Ethical Economics, 1996, pp 150-171 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Many States in the Twentieth Century have sought to redistribute the national wealth according to some principle of distributive justice, usually an egalitarian one. They have failed. Wealth is not a material substance that can be completely controlled or manipulated, and the attempt to control its distribution requires great concentrations of power, which themselves generate inequalities far worse than the ones they were supposed to remedy. Equality is not only an impracticable, but an incoherent, ideal. It only makes sense when the respect is specified in which people are, or should be, equal; and however many the respects in which people are equal, there are others in which they are, and should be, different. The arguments for egalitarianism are fallacious, although in some situations distributive justice requires limited equalities. In most business contexts, however, distributive justice requires that regard be paid to the contribution made by each individual, and hence favours differentials, though often practical difficulties, and sometimes ideological principles, may argue against. Even if distributive justice, rather than equality, is the aim, the State cannot distribute national wealth fairly, or adopt an overall incomes policy that is just, because the State does not exist for an agreed, overriding aim (though there is enough agreement on values to enable the State, in those few cases where such decisions have to be made, to make them on the basis of distributive justice). Because the State cannot be based on distributive justice, no satisfactory justification of the economic set-up can be given. There always will be grounds for legitimate complaint, based on the irrationalities and injustices that emerge when many people are making free decisions. Businessmen and others who make decisions should do what they can to be humane and to mitigate the misfortunes of the unlucky.

Keywords: Distributive Justice; National Wealth; Income Policy; Fire Brigade; Economic Equality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-38995-3_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230389953

DOI: 10.1057/9780230389953_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-38995-3_10