Paradise Lost: Impartiality of an Arbitrator

Joanna Jemielniak

Chapter 15 in Organizational Olympians, 2008, pp 165-174 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract The chapter discusses the demand of impartiality from an arbitrator in the context of his or her role as compared to the role of a judge. Although both the arbitrator and the judge pursue the goal of impartiality, their ways to achieve it differ significantly.

Keywords: Dispute Resolution; Arbitral Tribunal; Paradise Lost; Arbitral Award; Comparative Worth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-58358-0_17

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230583580

DOI: 10.1057/9780230583580_17

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().