Interrogating the argument

Andrew Kakabadse () and Nada Kakabadse ()
Additional contact information
Andrew Kakabadse: Cranfield University’s School of Management
Nada Kakabadse: University of Northampton Business School

Chapter Discipline 3 in Leading the board, 2008, pp 71-90 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Discipline 3 is about asking questions, providing an alternative view, being a skeptical voice when all are in agreement. It is the chairman’s job to create a culture of constructive dialogue, to interrogate the argument, to provide intellectual due diligence, and to push and question in search of the best solution.

Keywords: Board Member; Psychological Contract; Risk Management System; Socratic Dialogue; Constructive Dialogue (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-58966-7_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9780230589667

DOI: 10.1057/9780230589667_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().