 The Ethical ConstraintDavid Reisman Chapter 8 in Conservative Capitalism, 1999, pp 189-222 from Palgrave Macmillan Abstract: Abstract On the one hand there is Mandeville on the selfishness that succeeds: ‘Pride and Vanity have built more hospitals than all the Virtues together.’ (Mandeville, 1714:1, 261). On the other hand there is Marx on communism beyond shirking and greed: ‘Only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be left fully behind and society inscribe on its banners: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.’ (Marx, 1875:566). In the middle there is Adam Smith: ‘How selfish soever man may be supposed, there are evidently some principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it, except the pleasure of seeing it.’ (Smith, 1759:3). Stranded on the middle ground, what the pragmatic Smith expected from human nature in all its complexity was a balance between self-love and benevolence, a mixed orientation that made modern capitalism other-regarding even as the wealth of nations was dependent upon gain-seeking and competition. Keywords: Social Ethic; Ethical Constraint; Childless Couple; Narrow Approach; Mixed Orientation (search for similar items in EconPapers) There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-333-98278-5_8 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.