Consequences of Computational Limits

Stephen DeCanio ()

Chapter 2 in Limits of Economic and Social Knowledge, 2014, pp 20-32 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract It might seem odd that an economist would write a critique of a materialist approach to his field. After all, of the many areas of social inquiry, economics is the most concerned with the activities and institutions that influence the material aspects of human culture: the standard of living, production, investment, innovation, consumption, prices, and markets. In addition, more than any of the other social sciences, economics has emulated the natural sciences in adopting mathematical modeling as the standard format for its discourse (at least in academic circles). The scientific method is empirical and model-based. In economics, optimization and maximization principles have served to provide the restrictions that narrow the range of what allegedly can happen, leading to predictions that are testable and hypotheses that can be falsified.

Keywords: Social Knowledge; Turing Machine; Computational Limit; Human Freedom; Turing Test (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-37193-5_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137371935

DOI: 10.1057/9781137371935_2

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().