The Policy Process: Replacing Legal Aid by Recoverability
John Peysner
Additional contact information
John Peysner: University of Lincoln
Chapter 6 in Access to Justice, 2014, pp 40-63 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract The introduction of conditional fees as a replacement for legal aid funding in money damage claims had a tortuous history — very few measures have had quite so many consultation papers and associated documents as the new government created policy, apparently on the hoof. Part of the policy problem was that John Major’s Conservative government was quite well advanced in making changes consequent on Lord Woolf’s Access to Justice Inquiry into civil justice.1 This was not contentious between the political parties. In the Consultation Paper of August 1977, Access to Justice: Civil Procedure Rules about Costs, new rules on costs were advanced. Out of 75 pages there is one page devoted to non-recoverable conditional fees. This is all about the client challenging the base costs and the success fee (uplift). This was a rare event, as the maximum uplift was limited to 100% under S58(2) Legal Services Act 1990 and, in turn, to 25% of damages.2
Keywords: Legal Service; Personal Injury; Civil Procedure; Consultation Paper; Legal Cost (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-39723-2_6
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137397232
DOI: 10.1057/9781137397232_6
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().