Introduction

Leslie P. Willcocks, Chris Sauer and Mary C. Lacity

A chapter in Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems, 2015, pp 1-16 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract The field of Information Systems (IS) has long concerned itself with the process of enquiry, that is, what should be researched, the methods that can be properly utilized, and the assessment of the validity of outcomes. Like almost all social scientists, IS scholars have been greatly influenced by methods adopted by the natural sciences, and by the power of quantitative techniques. At the same time IS scholars have come from varied backgrounds, and the research role of qualitative enquiry, what the IS field has come to call ‘interpretive’ and ‘critical’ approaches, have been frequently juxtaposed against ‘positivist’ approaches. There is a case to be made that these are no longer helpful distinctions, if they ever were. Lee and Hubona (2009), for example, show common issues across seemingly different research approaches, namely common scientific basis, the fallacy of affirming the consequent and the issue of summative validity. A strong case has also been made for multi-methods and mixed methodologies (Mingers, 2001), and this approach has been increasingly adopted in recent years.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-137-50985-7_1

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137509857

DOI: 10.1057/9781137509857_1

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().