Wicksell Effects and Reswitchings of Technique in Capital Theory

Luigi L. Pasinetti
Additional contact information
Luigi L. Pasinetti: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

A chapter in The Theoretical Contributions of Knut Wicksell, 1979, pp 53-61 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract The difficulties in traditional capital theory, which have recently given rise to the reswitching of technique debate, are traced back to Knut Wicksell’s analysis of capital accumulation and to his discussions with Gustaf Åkerman. Some of the later discussions on the “Wicksell effect” are reviewed. It is shown that the separation of price changes from physical changes—which was proposed by David Champernowne and Trevor Swan in a polemical argument with Joan Robinson—is not possible, in general. It is concluded that Wicksell’s original arguments were correct, although incomplete. When “by the last portion of capital is meant an increase in social capital”, then not only is the marginal productivity of capital unrelated to the rate of profit in any predictable way—as Wicksell pointed out; it no longer has any useful role to play.

Keywords: Social Capital; Wage Rate; Capital Stock; Price Change; Capital Accumulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1979
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-04207-4_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349042074

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-04207-4_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().