When Does Majority Rule Supply Public Goods Efficiently?

Ted Bergstrom ()

A chapter in Measurement in Public Choice, 1981, pp 75-85 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract H.R. Bowen showed that majority voting leads to a Pareto efficient supply of a single public good if all voters have equal tax shares and if marginal rates of substitution for the public good are symmetrically distributed in the voting population. In general however, even if preferences are identical and tax shares equal, majority voting is not Pareto efficient if income is asymmetrically distributed. Here we formalize and generalize Bowen’s theorem. In the process we propose a new idea of a public goods allocation system, a “pseudo-Lindahl equilibrium”. Though it is Pareto efficient for an interesting class of societies, the informational requirements for implementing pseudo-Lindahl equilibrium are considerably less stringent than those for a true Lindahl equilibrium.

Keywords: Utility Function; Public Good; Majority Vote; Marginal Rate; Private Good (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1981
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-05090-1_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349050901

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-05090-1_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().