Monopolistic Competition

A. Koutsoyiannis
Additional contact information
A. Koutsoyiannis: University of Waterloo

Chapter 8 in Modern Microeconomics, 1975, pp 202-214 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Up to the early 1920s the classical theory of price included two main models, pure competition and monopoly. Duopoly models were considered as intellectual exercises rather than real-world situations. The general model of economic behaviour from Marshall to Knight1 was pure competition. In the late 1920s economists became increasingly dissatisfied with the use of pure competition as an analytical model of business behaviour. It was obvious that pure competition could not explain several empirical facts. The assumption of a homogeneous product, in the theory of competition, did not fit the real world. Furthermore advertising and other selling activities, practices widely used by businessmen, could not be explained by pure competition. Finally, firms expanded their output with falling costs, without however growing infinitely large, as the pure competition model would predict in the event of continuously decreasing costs.

Keywords: Demand Curve; Cost Curve; Selling Activity; Price Adjustment; Excess Capacity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1975
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-15603-0_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349156030

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-15603-0_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().