Introduction

Edmund Dell

Chapter 12 in The Politics of Economic Interdependence, 1987, pp 188-188 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract No attempt will be made here to prove or disprove arguments for free trade. The question will rather be of what value to governments, in deciding action, are the trade policy theories now current. It will be shown that it is not surprising that governments, who have to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions, do not find the arguments for free trade so persuasive as to commit themselves to them without thought of retreat. For the purposes of this book that is enough, though there are some who might feel that in adopting so moderate an objective I am throwing away a handful of aces. Trade theory is in bad repute, even among many economists. The attempted quantifications of the costs and benefits are among the least persuasive parts of the argument. It is the liberal economists themselves, starting with Adam Smith, who as much as anyone have mined their own arguments and muddied them with qualifications.

Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-18874-1_12

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349188741

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-18874-1_12

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().