Keynes versus the ‘Keynesians’…?
Terence W. Hutchison
Chapter 5 in A Critique of Keynesian Economics, 1986, pp 115-153 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract Three different sources of weakness and inadequacy may be distinguished in the process of decline and crisis of a once successful, or ‘orthodox’, system of theory, ‘paradigm’ or ‘research programme’ in economics, such as that of English Classical Political Economy or ‘the Ricardo-Mill economics’, as Jevons called it, or, a hundred years later, Keynesian economics.
Keywords: Trade Union; Aggregate Demand; Natural Rate; Wage Increase; Full Employment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1986
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-22481-4_5
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349224814
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-22481-4_5
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().