EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Innovative Learning and Institutions in the Process of Development: On the Microfoundation of Growth Regimes

Francesca Chiaromonte, Giovanni Dosi and Luigi Orsenigo

Chapter 8 in Learning and Technological Change, 1993, pp 117-149 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract In his recent assessment of growth theories, Moses Abramovitz refers back to the Wealth of Nations as the illustrious ancestor of a long stream of investigations on the determinants of economic growth (Abramovitz, 1989). In fact, in the famous proposition on the dynamics linking division of labour, productivity and market growth, Adam Smith identifies one of many positive feedback loops between innovative learning and economic development. Since then, the evidence on the microeconomics of learning and innovation has got much richer, especially in recent years (a survey in Dosi, 1988). However, standard growth theory has proved to be hardly suitable to incorporate the microevidence on, for example, dynamic increasing returns, path dependent learning, ‘disequilibrium’ search processes, interfirm and international differences in technological capabilities and so on, notwithstanding recent increasing returns equilibrium models (see Romer, 1986, 1990; Lucas, 1988; Aghion and Howitt, 1989; Grossman and Helpman, 1991). Neither has standard theory focused on the institutions and behavioural norms underlying economic coordination and development: that is, what are the institutional mechanisms that allow the ‘Invisible Hand’ to operate in a world that continuosly innovates? Again, that question can be traced back to Adam Smith, where he asks — in the Wealth of Nations and, especially, in the Theory of Moral Sentiments — what are the ‘moral inclinations’, beliefs and behaviours that make non-destructive interactions possible in market societies. However, since Adam Smith, attempts at an answer have mainly been left to disciplines other than economics. In that, the typical economic assumptions of ‘perfect rationality’ and equilibrium have often hindered any proper account of the sociology and ‘political economy’ of development.

Keywords: Market Share; Decision Rule; Labour Productivity; Technical Change; Technological Learning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Chapter: Innovative Learning and Institutions in the Process of Development: On the Microfoundation of Growth Regimes (2000) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-22855-3_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349228553

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-22855-3_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-01
Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-22855-3_8