Morals and Markets: Some Theoretical and Policy Implications of Ethical Investing

Alan Lewis, Paul Webley, Adrian Winnett and Craig Mackenzie
Additional contact information
Alan Lewis: Bath University
Paul Webley: University of Exeter
Adrian Winnett: Bath University
Craig Mackenzie: Bath University

Chapter 9 in Choice and Public Policy, 1998, pp 164-182 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Margaret Thatcher was fond of retelling the parable of the Good Samaritan. In her version the main point was not only that the Good Samaritan was shown to be putting into practice neighbourly concern, but also that he had the money so to do. By implication, a government prepared to restrain public expenditure and reduce taxation is handing moral responsibility for the provision of welfare back to individuals. With a reduced tax burden, the government can be seen as empowering people to put their money where their morals are, which they may exhibit by giving to charity and making provision, through private insurance and savings schemes, for schooling, future health needs, and retirement.

Keywords: Corporate Governance; Moral Responsibility; Pension Fund; Ethical Belief; Financial Advisor (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-26302-8_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349263028

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-26302-8_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().