 Instability, Volatility and the Process of Capital AccumulationJan Kregel, Augusto Graziani and Guido M. Rey Chapter 5 in Economic Theory and Social Justice, 1999, pp 149-175 from Palgrave Macmillan Abstract: Abstract It is ironic that the breakdown of the golden-age of post-war capital accumulation in the 1970s should have signalled the crisis of Keynesian economics. Ironic, for as Fausto Vicarelli pointed out, Keynes’s entire theoretical edifice was constructed in order to interpret the instability of capitalism, indeed ‘the stimulus to his analysis was always some moment of capitalist crisis’. In contrast to those announcing the ‘crisis of Keynesian economics’ in the face of the increasing instability of the 1970s, Vicarelli argued forcefully ‘that Keynes’s thought has direct relevance to the present moment of capitalist crisis’ (Vicarelli, 1984, p. 184). Yet, as a result of the crisis, the majority of economists have abandoned Keynes’s theory in favour of what has come to be called the ‘New Classical’ economics, which seems to exclude instability by definition, or the inappropriately named ‘New Keynesian’ economics, which seems to rely on the failure of the perfectly competitive market to allocate information efficiently. Keywords: Capital Accumulation; User Cost; Spot Price; Spot Prex; Capital Equipment (search for similar items in EconPapers) There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palchp:978-1-349-26981-5_8 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-26981-5_8 Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Palgrave Macmillan Books from Palgrave Macmillan |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.