Farm Labourers: Exit, Loyalty, or Voice?

James Simpson

Chapter Chapter 8 in Family Farmers, Land Reforms and Political Action, 2024, pp 173-196 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract This chapter argues that most farm workers preferred loyalty to their employers, or exit and higher paid urban employment, to that of voice, and the creation of rural trade unions and farm strikes. In Eastern Europe, land reform significantly reduced the number of landless workers, but trade unions were also frequently repressed by governments. In Western Europe, organizing farm labour, even with trade unions, proved difficult because of the highly varied nature of farm work, while permanent and causal workers often had conflicting interests. Several governments following the First World War included farm workers in general legislation concerning minimum wages and the length of the workday or included general conditions for workers within a broader package to support farming. It also explains why, exceptionally, large groups of farm workers choose voice rather than loyalty and exit, and why landowners and farmers sought to arm fascist groups to restore their traditional control in the Italian countryside, and after the military coup in Spain in 1936.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:palscp:978-3-031-67281-1_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783031672811

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-67281-1_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Studies in Economic History from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().