 Paternalism in Economics: Redefinitions and the Behavioral TurnPéter Cserne Chapter Chapter 3 in Freedom of Contract and Paternalism, 2012, pp 29-50 from Palgrave Macmillan Abstract: Abstract In this chapter I analyze whether economic theory possesses the necessary tools for assessing freedom of choice and paternalism adequately. First, I discuss how economists refine their analytical tools and redefine the concept of paternalism in order to fit the latter in the methodological framework of their discipline. I argue that the traditional economic approach is a non-reflexive mixture of liberalism and utilitarianism. As such, it is ill-equipped to handle the problems that arise when these two principles collide. Economics has striven to justify instances of reasonable, seemingly paternalistic regulations in several ways, often deliberately avoiding the term paternalism. I distinguish several types of this theoretical strategy of redefinition. The methodological lesson of this overview will be that if economic analysis should understand paternalism and have an impact on public debates about paternalistic policies it should both reconsider its normative assumptions and rely more systematically on empirical research. Keywords: Market Failure; Behavioral Economic; Rational Choice Theory; Mainstream Economic; Consumer Sovereignty (search for similar items in EconPapers) There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:pfschp:978-1-137-00032-3_3 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Perspectives from Social Economics from Palgrave Macmillan |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.