Conclusion: Old and New in “New Paternalism”

Péter Cserne

Chapter Chapter 6 in Freedom of Contract and Paternalism, 2012, pp 137-139 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract The interdisciplinary character of law and economics research has always raised questions about the possibilities and limits of intellectual integration.1 Roughly speaking, one can distinguish three law-related discourses in which arguments from economics can be relevant: normative legal philosophy, an explanatory theory of law, and policy proposals for legal reform.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:pfschp:978-1-137-00032-3_6

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781137000323

DOI: 10.1057/9781137000323_6

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Perspectives from Social Economics from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().