Early Critical Reactions to Pareto
Fiorenzo Mornati ()
Additional contact information
Fiorenzo Mornati: University of Turin
Chapter 13 in Vilfredo Pareto: An Intellectual Biography Volume II, 2018, pp 285-309 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract It is worth concluding this reconstruction of the second phase in Pareto’s intellectual biography with a survey of the numerous critical reactions to the Course in Political Economy (Pareto stated that his intention had been to make of the Course “a worthy free-trader study” as well as “a work as full of facts as possible, to prove that it is not true that we classical economists ignore history and experience”, Pareto to Pantaleoni, 31st March 1896, see Pareto (1984a, p. 428)) and the opening stages of the debate over the law of income distribution, which together combined to retrieve Pareto from the almost total obscurity in which he had existed hitherto. (In fact, the Considerations had attracted very little attention on publication, other than from Pantaleoni and Walras. The first instalment had been acknowledged in 1892 by the non-scientific free-trader economist Maurice Block, who, in the Journal des Economistes, LI, X-1, p. 62, had also recorded that he too had examined Cournot’s economic ideas, finding them not only erroneous but also impossible to correct via the use of mathematics. He had added that Pareto, who saw the value of mathematics, went astray, firstly, because passions cannot be measured, secondly, because it is impossible to take all the innumerable causes of events into account and, thirdly, because mathematics does not allow us to understand phenomena which could not be formalised such as chemical reactions or the determination of salaries. On the other hand, Marshall’s pupil Sanger (Economic Journal V-3: 113–138, 1895, pp. 113–138) had referred, without further comment, to the mathematical reasoning underlying Pareto’s critique of the hypothesis concerning the constancy of the marginal utility of money and Edgeworth’s theory of index numbers and had reproduced the first part of his demonstration of the optimality of free competition.)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:pshchp:978-3-030-04540-1_13
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783030045401
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-04540-1_13
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().