The Real-Bills Doctrine in the Light of the Law of Reflux

David Glasner ()

Chapter Chapter 4 in Studies in the History of Monetary Theory, 2021, pp 85-112 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract This chapter considers the law of reflux and its alternative interpretations: (1) as a monetary policy rule for stabilizing the price level and (2) as rule for individual banks to follow to remain liquid. The chapter argues that Adam Smith endorsed only the second interpretation, and that the motivation for Smith to endorse the real-bills doctrine was his belief that banks were subject to what John Fullarton would later call the law of reflux. The paper discusses Smith’s reasoning in support of the real-bills doctrine in comparison to Fullarton’s analysis of the law of reflux as well as Fullarton’s equivocal attitude toward the real-bills doctrine.

Keywords: Real-bills doctrine; Law of reflux; Convertibility; Overissue; Currency School; Banking School (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:pshchp:978-3-030-83426-5_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783030834265

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83426-5_4

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().