Say’s Law and the Classical Theory of Depressions

David Glasner ()

Chapter Chapter 9 in Studies in the History of Monetary Theory, 2021, pp 239-259 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Say’s Law occupies a prominent, but equivocal, position in the history of economics, the object of repeated controversies about its meaning and significance since first propounded in the nineteenth century. This chapter proposes a unifying interpretation of Say’s Law based on the idea that the monetary sector of an economy with competitively supplied money involves two distinct markets, not one. Beyond modifying the interpretation of the inconsistency between Say’s Law and a monetary economy, the paper challenges another interpretation of Say’s Law as being refuted by depressions and lapses from full employment. Under the alternative interpretation, Say’s Law suggests a causal theory whereby disequilibrium in one market reduces demand in other markets, initiating a cumulative shrinkage of both demand and supply.

Keywords: Say’s Law; Say’s Identity; Law of reflux; Walras’s Law; General gluts; Depressions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:pshchp:978-3-030-83426-5_9

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783030834265

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83426-5_9

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().